Connect with us

General

I Have a Capital Suggestion for a New Pronoun

I’ve long thought that using “they” as a gender-neutral pronoun — as in “My cousin had long hair, and they got it cut today” — is just great. It’s been used that way for at least 600 years, whether pedants like it or not. “A person can’t help their …

Published

on

I’ve long thought that using “they” as a gender-neutral pronoun — as in “My cousin had long hair, and they got it cut today” — is just great. It’s been used that way for at least 600 years, whether pedants like it or not. “A person can’t help their birth” (Thackeray in “Vanity Fair”). “And whoever finds himself out of such blame / They will come up and offer in God’s name” (Chaucer in “The Canterbury Tales”). To many English speakers, it has long felt quite natural.

As for the use of “they” to denote nonbinary identity, it serves a real linguistic need, but many English speakers find it confusing. Consider this quotation from an article from The New Yorker on the literary theorist Judith Butler: “More than 900 people filled an auditorium in Ankara to hear them speak. ‘Not just academics but L.G.B.T.Q. activists, antiwar activists, sex workers.’ Butler told me that they had little notion of what was happening at first.” Grammatically, it’s easy to read the “they” as referring to the crowds, not Butler. Or: “Butler was met by protesters holding placards depicting them with devil horns. They burned a puppet bearing a witch’s hat.” Did protesters burn the puppet? Or did Butler?

I have been thinking for a while about how to make this new usage less ambiguous, and I previously presented an idea or two. But for written language, at least, here’s a better one: When “they” refers to a nonbinary person, why not capitalize it?

“Butler told me that They had little notion of what was happening at first.” There, fixed it.

Change can be hard, but a capitalized “they” might not be such a stretch. In fact, the habit of capitalizing “I” was also a practical adaptation to avoid confusion, back in the days when m was written “ııı” and n was written “ıı.” A stray “i” floating around before or after one of those could make the whole thing hard to read, so uppercase it went. And now it seems perfectly logical.

I have a personal example. I found it hard to get much interested in capitalizing “Black,” as I once discussed here. I am a creature of habit, and it seemed to me that there were bigger fish to fry. But because an august newspaper for which I write capitalizes it and expects me to do so in the copy I file, I have noticed myself capitalizing it in writing I do elsewhere, too. It’s becoming a habit. It took less than a year for me to develop it.